Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3643
Articles: 2'487'895
Articles rated: 2609

29 March 2024
 
  » arxiv » astro-ph/0604070

 Article overview


Non-Gaussianity in the Very Small Array CMB maps with Smooth-Goodness-of-fit tests
Jose Alberto Rubino-Martin ; Antonio M. Aliaga ; R. B. Barreiro ; Richard A. Battye ; Pedro Carreira ; Kieran Cleary ; Rod D. Davies ; Richard J. Davis ; Clive Dickinson ; Ricardo Genova-Santos ; Keith Grainge ; Carlos M. Gutierrez ; Yaser A. Hafez ; Michael P. Hobson ; Michael E. Jones ; Rudiger Kneissl ; Katy Lancaster ; Anthony Lasenby ; J. P. Leahy ; Klaus Maisinger ; Enrique Martinez-Gonzalez ; Guy G. Pooley ; Nutan Rajguru ; Rafael Rebolo ; Jose Luis Sanz ; Richard D.E. Saunders ; Richard S. Savage ; Anna Scaife ; Paul Scott ; Anze Slosar ; Angela C. Taylor ; David Titterington ; Elizabeth Waldram ; Robert A. Watson ;
Date 4 Apr 2006
Abstract(Abridged) We have used the Rayner & Best (1989) smooth tests of goodness-of-fit to study the Gaussianity of the Very Small Array (VSA) data. Out of the 41 published VSA individual pointings dedicated to cosmological observations, 37 are found to be consistent with Gaussianity, whereas four pointings show deviations from Gaussianity. In two of them, these deviations can be explained as residual systematic effects of a few visibility points which, when corrected, have a negligible impact on the angular power spectrum. The non-Gaussianity found in the other two (adjacent) pointings seems to be associated to a local deviation of the power spectrum of these fields with respect to the common power spectrum of the complete data set, at angular scales of the third acoustic peak (l = 700-900). No evidence of residual systematics is found in this case, and unsubstracted point sources are not a plausible explanation either. If those visibilities are removed, a cosmological analysis based on this new VSA power spectrum alone shows no differences in the parameter constraints with respect to our published results, except for the physical baryon density, which decreases by 10 percent. Finally, the method has been also used to analyse the VSA observations in the Corona Borealis supercluster region (Genova-Santos et al. 2005), which show a strong decrement which cannot be explained as primordial CMB. Our method finds a clear deviation (99.82%) with respect to Gaussianity in the second-order moment of the distribution, and which can not be explained as systematic effects. A detailed study shows that the non-Gaussianity is produced in scales of l~500, and that this deviation is intrinsic to the data (in the sense that can not be explained in terms of a Gaussian field with a different power spectrum).
Source arXiv, astro-ph/0604070
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser claudebot






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica