Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'504'585
Articles rated: 2609

24 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » astro-ph/0606088

 Article overview



A re-analysis of the three-year WMAP temperature power spectrum and likelihood
H. K. Eriksen ; Greg Huey ; R. Saha ; F. K. Hansen ; J. Dick ; A. J. Banday ; K. M. Gorski ; P. Jain ; J. B. Jewell ; L. Knox ; D. L. Larson ; I. J. O’Dwyer ; T. Souradeep ; B. D. Wandelt ;
Date 5 Jun 2006
AbstractWe analyze the three-year WMAP temperature anisotropy data seeking to confirm the power spectrum and likelihoods published by the WMAP team. We apply five independent implementations of four algorithms to the power spectrum estimation and two implementations to the parameter estimation. These results are then exhaustively cross-checked by the five different research groups who performed the work. This provides a high degree of confidence that the results are well understood with respect to both implicit and explicit assumptions. Our single most important result is that we broadly confirm the WMAP power spectrum and analysis. Still, we do find two small but potentially important discrepancies: On large angular scales there is a small power excess in the WMAP spectrum (5-10% at l < 50) primarily due to residual foregrounds and secondarily to numerical and statistical issues. On small angular scales there is a systematic difference between the V- and W-band spectra (few percent at l > 300). The origin of the latter discrepancy has not yet been identified, and this requires further attention. As far as the low-l bias is concerned, most parameters are affected by a few tenths of a sigma. The most important effect is seen in n_s, for which the evidence for n_s /= 1 is weakened by 0.4 sigma: For the combination of WMAP, Acbar and BOOMERanG, the significance of n_s /= 1 drops from ~2.7 sigma to ~2.3 sigma when correcting for this bias. Finally, we propose a few simple improvements to the low-l WMAP likelihood code that alleviate the low-l bias, and also introduce a few important extensions to the Gibbs sampling method that allows for proper sampling of the low signal-to-noise regime.
Source arXiv, astro-ph/0606088
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica