|
| | | | |
| | | |
| Stat |
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'504'585
Articles rated: 2609
25 April 2024 |
|
| | | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
|
Galaxy Group Analysis - a Robust Discriminator between Cosmological Models: Cold+HOT Dark Matter and CDM Confront Cfa1 | | R. Nolthenius
; A.A. Klypin
; J.R. Primack
; | | Date: |
30 Oct 1994 | | Abstract: | We present techniques for identifying and analyzing galaxy groups and show that they provide a powerful discriminator between cosmological models. We apply these to high-resolution PM N-body simulations of structure formation in CHDM (cold/hot/baryon fractions=.6/.3/.1, b=1.5 (COBE norm) and two CDM models; b=1.5 and b=1.0 (COBE norm). Groups are identified with the Nolthenius (1993) algorithm. We find: (1) Properties of groups are a powerful and robust discriminator between these Gaussian models whose spatial and velocity properties differ on Mpc scales. We test robustness against several methods for assigning luminosity to dark matter halos, for merging CfA1 galaxies, and for breaking up massive over-mergers (2) When allowance is made for the high large scale power P(k) present in the CfA1 data, CHDM at our $Omnu=0.30$ produces slightly too many groups and groups too high a fraction of the galaxies, while the fraction grouped in CDM is far too low. Lowering $Omnu$ would appear to produce close agreement with all measures, save one: for all simulations, median group sizes are x1.4-1.7 larger than equivalently selected CfA1 groups. (3) The standard group M/L method gives $Omegasimeq 0.1$ for CHDM and CfA1, and $Omegasimeq 0.35$ for CDM. A conspiracy of three effects produce these very low values, and we conclude that low observed $Omega$’s need not argue for a low $Omega$ universe. When overmergers are broken up, the median virial- to-DM mass of 3D selected groups is $sim1$ for all simulations. $M_{DM}>10^{14}Msun$ groups appear virialized in all simulations. Global velocity biases $b_v$ are similar to previous studies. Within 3D-selected groups, CHDM and CDM b=1.5 show a stronger bias of $b_v=0.7-0.8$, while CDM b=1.0 shows group $b_v$’s $simeq 1$. | | Source: | arXiv, astro-ph/9410095 | | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites | |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
| |
REGISTER