Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'504'585
Articles rated: 2609

25 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » astro-ph/0609606

 Article overview



A new luminous supersoft X-ray source in NGC 300
S. Carpano ; J. Wilms ; M. Schirmer ; E. Kendziorra ;
Date 21 Sep 2006
AbstractContext. We report the discovery of a new luminous supersoft source, XMMU J005455.0-374117, in the nearby spiral galaxy NGC 300, in XMM-Newton observations performed on 2005 May 22 and on 2005 November 25. The source is not present in ROSAT data nor in the previous XMM-Newton observations of 2000 December/2001 January. The unique luminous supersoft source, XMMU J005510.7-373855, detected in the 1992 May/June ROSAT data and in the 2000/2001 XMM-Newton data, fell below detectability. This source already appeared highly variable in ROSAT observations. Aims. We report on the temporal and spectral analysis of this new supersoft source (SSS) and compare its properties with the previous known SSS. Methods. We present the light curves of the SSS, model its spectrum and estimate the corresponding flux and luminosities. Results. The light curve of XMMU J005455.0-374117 does not show large fluctuations in any of the observations and its spectrum can be modelled with an absorbed blackbody with kT~60eV. The corresponding bolometric luminosity is 8.1e38 erg/s in the first observation and drops to 2.2e38 erg/s six months later. No optical source brighter than mV~21.7 mag is found coincident with its position. Conclusions. The luminosity of these two SSSs is higher than what has been found for `classical’ SSSs. Their nature could be explained by beamed emission from steady nuclear burning of hydrogen onto white dwarfs, or accretion onto stellar-mass black hole with matter outflow or observed at high inclination angle. The presence of an intermediate-mass black hole seems unlikely in our case.
Source arXiv, astro-ph/0609606
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica