Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'500'096
Articles rated: 2609

19 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » astro-ph/0611424

 Article overview


A Wolf-Rayet/black-hole X-ray binary candidate in NGC 300
S. Carpano ; A.M.T. Pollock ; J. Wilms ; M. Ehle ; M. Schirmer ;
Date 14 Nov 2006
AbstractContext. Wolf Rayet/black hole binaries are believed to exist as a later evolutionary product of high-mass X-ray binaries. Hundreds of such binaries may exist in galaxies, but only a few of them are close enough to be observed as X-ray binaries. Only a couple of candidates have been reported so far. Aims. Based on XMM-Newton observations, we report the positional coincidence of the brightest X-ray source in NGC 300 (NGC 300 X-1) with a Wolf-Rayet candidate. Temporal and spectral analysis of the X-ray source is performed. Methods. We determine an accurate X-ray position of the object, and derive light curves, spectra and flux in four XMM-Newton observations. Results. The positions of the X-ray source and the helium star candidate coincide within 0.11"+-0.45". The X-ray light curves show irregular variability. During one XMM-Newton observation, the flux increased by about a factor of ten in 10 hours. The spectrum can be modelled by a power-law with Gamma~2.45 with additional relatively weak line emission, notably around 0.95 kev. The mean observed (absorbed) luminosity in the 0.2-10 kev band is ~2x10^38 erg/s. Conclusions. NGC 300 X-1 is a good candidate for a Wolf-Rayet/black-hole X-ray binary: its position coincides with a Wolf-Rayet candidate and the unabsorbed X-ray luminosity reached L(0.2-10 kev)~1x10^39 erg/s, suggesting the presence of a black hole.
Source arXiv, astro-ph/0611424
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica