|
| | | | |
| | | |
| Stat |
Members: 2980
Articles: 2'029'581
Articles rated: 2577
19 January 2021 |
|
| | | | |
|
Article forum
| |
|
|
Reply to "Comment on "Some implications of the quantum nature of laser fields for quantum computations'''' | | Julio Gea-Banacloche
; | | Date: |
4 Dec 2002 | | Subject: | quant-ph | | Abstract: | In this revised reply to quant-ph/0211165, I address the question of the validity of my results in greater detail, by comparing my predictions to those of the Silberfarb-Deutsch model, and I deal at greater length with the beam area paradox. As before, I conclude that my previous results are an (order-of-magnitude) accurate estimate of the error probability introduced in quantum logical operations by the quantum nature of the laser field. While this error will typically (for a paraxial beam) be smaller than the total error due to spontaneous emission, a unified treatment of both effects reveals that they lead to formally similar constraints on the minimum number of photons per pulse required to perform an operation with a given accuracy; these constraints agree with those I have derived elsewhere. | | Source: | arXiv, quant-ph/0212027 | | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites | |
|
|
No message found in this article forum.
You have a question or message about this article?
Ask the community and write a message in the forum.
If you want to rate this article, please use the review section..
To add a message in the forum, you need to login or register first. (free): registration page
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
| |
REGISTER