| | |
| | |
Stat |
Members: 3667 Articles: 2'599'751 Articles rated: 2609
07 February 2025 |
|
| | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
Systematic search for extremely metal poor galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey | A. B. Morales-Luis
; J. Sanchez Almeida
; J. A. L. Aguerri
; C. Munoz-Tunon
; | Date: |
1 Sep 2011 | Abstract: | We carry out a systematic search for extremely metal poor (XMP) galaxies in
the spectroscopic sample of Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) data release 7
(DR7). The XMP candidates are found by classifying all the galaxies according
to the form of their spectra in a region 80AA wide around Halpha. Due to the
data size, the method requires an automatic classification algorithm. We use
k-means. Our systematic search renders 32 galaxies having negligible [NII]
lines, as expected in XMP galaxy spectra. Twenty one of them have been
previously identified as XMP galaxies in the literature -- the remaining eleven
are new. This was established after a thorough bibliographic search that
yielded only some 130 galaxies known to have an oxygen metallicity ten times
smaller than the Sun (explicitly, with 12+log(O/H) <= 7.65). XMP galaxies are
rare; they represent 0.01% of the galaxies with emission lines in SDSS/DR7.
Although the final metallicity estimate of all candidates remains pending,
strong-line empirical calibrations indicate a metallicity about one-tenth
solar, with the oxygen metallicity of the twenty one known targets being
12+log(O/H)= 7.61 +- 0.19. Since the SDSS catalog is limited in apparent
magnitude, we have been able to estimate the volume number density of XMP
galaxies in the local universe, which turns out to be (1.32 +- 0.23) x 10^-4
Mpc^-3. The XMP galaxies constitute 0.1% of the galaxies in the local volume,
or some 0.2% considering only emission line galaxies. All but four of our
candidates are blue compact dwarf galaxies (BCDs), and 24 of them have either
cometary shape or are formed by chained knots. | Source: | arXiv, 1109.0235 | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
|
| |
|
|
|