Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3669
Articles: 2'599'751
Articles rated: 2609

16 March 2025
 
  » arxiv » 1508.0384

 Article overview



G2 and Sgr A*: A Cosmic Fizzle At The Galactic Center
Brian Morsony ; Brandon Gracey ; Jared Workman ; DooSoo Yoon ;
Date 3 Aug 2015
AbstractWe carry out a series of simulations of G2-type clouds interacting with the black hole Sgr A* at the galactic center. We determine that the accretion rate from the gas cloud onto Sgr A* for a range of simulation parameters, such as cloud structure, background structure, background density, grid resolution, and accretion radius. Regardless of the numerical considerations, the amount of cloud material accreted is small, both compared to the total cloud mass and the normal background accretion rate. The accretion rate will remain small for at least 30 years after periapsis. We also model Br-gamma, bolometric, and X-ray emission from the cloud with a variety of density profiles, and compare to observational data. In simulations, the bolometric and X-ray luminosity have a peak in luminosity lasting from about 1 year before to 1 year after periapsis, a feature not detected in observations. Simulated Br-gamma emission remains nearly flat with a small peak 1 month to 1 year before periapsis, depending on how centrally concentrated the cloud is. Br-gamma emission decreases rapidly as the cloud passes periapsis due to shock heating of the gas. Observations show an increase of the FWHM of the Br-gamma line velocity dispersion leading up to periapsis, consistent with our simulations. Reproducing observations of G2 likely requires two components for the object: an extended, cold gas cloud responsible for the Br-gamma emission, and a compact core or dusty stellar object dominating the bolometric luminosity. Any emission from a gaseous component of G2 should be undetectable by 1 year after periapsis, due to shock heating and expansion of the cloud. Any remaining emission should be from the compact component of G2.
Source arXiv, 1508.0384
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free

home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2025 - Scimetrica