Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3667
Articles: 2'599'751
Articles rated: 2609

07 February 2025
 
  » arxiv » 1608.8794

 Article overview



Distinguishing between MSSM and NMSSM through $Delta F=2$ processes
Jacky Kumar ; Michael Paraskevas ;
Date 4 Sep 2016
AbstractWe study deviations between MSSM and $Z_3$-invariant NMSSM, with respect to their predictions in $Delta F=2 $ processes. We find that potentially significant effects arise either from the well known double-penguin diagrams, due to the extra scalar NMSSM states, or from neutralino-gluino box contributions, due to the extended neutralino sector. Both are discussed to be effective in the large $ aneta$ regime. Enhanced genuine-NMSSM contributions in double penguins are expected for a light singlet spectrum (CP-even,CP-odd), while the magnitude of box effects is primarily controlled through singlino mixing. The latter is found to be typically subleading (but non-negligible) for $lambda lesssim 0.5$, however it can become dominant for $lambdasim mathcal{O}(1)$. We also study the low $ aneta$ regime, where a distinction between MSSM and NMSSM can come instead due to experimental constraints, acting differently on the allowed parameter space of each model. To this end, we incorporate the LHC Run-I limits from $H ightarrow Z Z$, $A ightarrow hZ$ and $H^pm ightarrow au u $ non-observation along with Higgs observables and set (different) upper bounds for new physics contributions in $Delta F=2 $ processes. We find that a $sim 25\%$ contribution in $Delta M_{s(d)}$ is still possible for MFV models, however such a large effect is nowadays severely constrained for the case of MSSM, due to stronger bounds on the charged Higgs masses.
Source arXiv, 1608.8794
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free

home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2025 - Scimetrica