Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3667
Articles: 2'599'751
Articles rated: 2609

07 February 2025
 
  » arxiv » 1609.0123

 Article overview



Effective criteria for specific identifiability of tensors and forms
Luca Chiantini ; Giorgio Ottaviani ; Nick Vannieuwenhoven ;
Date 1 Sep 2016
AbstractIn applications where the tensor rank decomposition arises, one often relies on its identifiability properties for interpreting the individual rank-$1$ terms appearing in the decomposition. Several criteria for identifiability have been proposed in the literature, however few results exist on how frequently they are satisfied. We propose to call a criterion effective if it is satisfied on a dense, open subset of the smallest semi-algebraic set enclosing the set of rank-$r$ tensors. We analyze the effectiveness of Kruskal’s criterion when it is combined with reshaping. It is proved that this criterion is effective for both real and complex tensors in its entire range of applicability, which is usually much smaller than the smallest typical rank. Our proof explains when reshaping-based algorithms for computing tensor rank decompositions may be expected to recover the decomposition. Specializing the analysis to symmetric tensors or forms reveals that the reshaped Kruskal criterion may even be effective up to the smallest typical rank for some third, fourth and sixth order symmetric tensors of small dimension as well as for binary forms of degree at least three. We extended this result to $4 imes 4 imes 4 imes 4$ symmetric tensors by analyzing the Hilbert function, resulting in a criterion for symmetric identifiability that is effective up to symmetric rank $8$, which is optimal.
Source arXiv, 1609.0123
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free

home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2025 - Scimetrica