| | |
| | |
Stat |
Members: 3657 Articles: 2'599'751 Articles rated: 2609
14 October 2024 |
|
| | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
Statistical and Computational Complexities of BFGS Quasi-Newton Method for Generalized Linear Models | Qiujiang Jin
; Tongzheng Ren
; Nhat Ho
; Aryan Mokhtari
; | Date: |
1 Jun 2022 | Abstract: | The gradient descent (GD) method has been used widely to solve parameter
estimation in generalized linear models (GLMs), a generalization of linear
models when the link function can be non-linear. While GD has optimal
statistical and computational complexities for estimating the true parameter
under the high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) regime of the GLMs, it has
sub-optimal complexities when the SNR is low, namely, the iterates of GD
require polynomial number of iterations to reach the final statistical radius.
The slow convergence of GD for the low SNR case is mainly due to the local
convexity of the least-square loss functions of the GLMs. Even though Newton’s
method can be used to resolve the flat curvature of the loss functions, its
computational cost is prohibitive in high-dimensional settings due to its per
iteration cost of $mathcal{O}(d^3)$. To address the shortcomings of GD and
Newton’s method, we propose to use Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno (BFGS)
quasi-Newton method to solve parameter estimation of the GLMs, which has a per
iteration cost of $mathcal{O}(d^2)$. On the optimization side, when the SNR is
low, we demonstrate that iterates of BFGS converge linearly to the optimal
solution of the population least-square loss function, and the contraction
coefficient of the BFGS algorithm is comparable to that of Newton’s method. On
the statistical side, we prove that the iterates of BFGS reach the final
statistical radius of the low SNR GLMs after a logarithmic number of
iterations, which is much lower than the polynomial number of iterations of GD.
We also present numerical experiments that match our theoretical findings. | Source: | arXiv, 2206.00207 | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
|
| |
|
|
|