| | |
| | |
Stat |
Members: 3657 Articles: 2'599'751 Articles rated: 2609
06 October 2024 |
|
| | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
Strict Half-Singleton Bound, Strict Direct Upper Bound for Linear Insertion-Deletion Codes and Optimal Codes | Qinqin Ji
; Dabin Zheng
; Hao Chen
; Xiaoqiang Wang
; | Date: |
1 Jun 2022 | Abstract: | Insertion-deletion codes (insdel codes for short) are used for correcting
synchronization errors in communications, and in other many interesting fields
such as DNA storage, date analysis, race-track memory error correction and
language processing, and have recently gained a lot of attention. To determine
the insdel distances of linear codes is a very challenging problem. The
half-Singleton bound on the insdel distances of linear codes due to
Cheng-Guruswami-Haeupler-Li is a basic upper bound on the insertion-deletion
error-correcting capabilities of linear codes. On the other hand the natural
direct upper bound $d_I(mathcal C) leq 2d_H(mathcal C)$ is valid for any
insdel code. In this paper, for a linear insdel code $mathcal C$ we propose a
strict half-Singleton upper bound $d_I(mathcal C) leq 2(n-2k+1)$ if $mathcal
C$ does not contain the codeword with all 1s, and a stronger direct upper bound
$d_I(mathcal C) leq 2(d_H(mathcal C)-t)$ under a weak condition, where
$tgeq 1$ is a positive integer determined by the generator matrix. We also
give optimal linear insdel codes attaining our strict half-Singleton bound and
direct upper bound, and show that the code length of optimal binary linear
insdel codes with respect to the (strict) half-Singleton bound is about twice
the dimension. Interestingly explicit optimal linear insdel codes attaining the
(strict) half-Singleton bound, with the code length being independent of the
finite field size, are given. | Source: | arXiv, 2206.00287 | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
|
| |
|
|
|