Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3665
Articles: 2'599'751
Articles rated: 2609

18 January 2025
 
  » arxiv » 2301.00543

 Article overview



On pseudo-real finite subgroups of $operatorname{PGL}_3(mathbb{C})$
Eslam Badr ; Ahmad Elguindy ;
Date 2 Jan 2023
AbstractLet $G$ be a finite subgroup of $operatorname{PGL}_3(mathbb{C})$, and let $sigma$ be the generator of $operatorname{Gal}(mathbb{C}/mathbb{R})$. We say that $G$ has a emph{real field of moduli} if $^{sigma}G$ and $G$ are $operatorname{PGL}_3(mathbb{C})$-conjugates, that is, if $exists,phiinoperatorname{PGL}_3(mathbb{C})$ such that $phi^{-1},G,phi=,^{sigma}G$. Furthermore, we say that $mathbb{R}$ is emph{a field of definition for $G$} or that emph{$G$ is definable over $mathbb{R}$} if $G$ is $operatorname{PGL}_3(mathbb{C})$-conjugate to some $G’subsetoperatorname{PGL}_3(mathbb{R})$. In this situation, we call $G’$ emph{a model for $G$ over $mathbb{R}$}. If $G$ has $mathbb{R}$ as a field of definition but is not definable over $mathbb{R}$, then we call $G$ emph{pseudo-real}.
In this paper, we first show that any finite cyclic subgroup $G=mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}$ in $operatorname{PGL}_3(mathbb{C})$ has {a real field of moduli} and we provide a necessary and sufficient condition for $G=mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}$ to be definable over $mathbb{R}$; see Theorems 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3. We also prove that any dihedral group $operatorname{D}_{2n}$ with $ngeq3$ in $operatorname{PGL}_3(mathbb{C})$ is definable over $mathbb{R}$; see Theorem 2.4. Furthermore, we study all six classes of finite primitive subgroups of $operatorname{PGL}_3(mathbb{C})$, and show that all of them except the icosahedral group $operatorname{A}_5$ are pseudo-real; see Theorem 2.5, whereas $operatorname{A}_5$ is definable over $mathbb{R}$. Finally, we explore the connection of these notions in group theory with their analogues in arithmetic geometry; see Theorem 2.6 and Example 2.7.
Source arXiv, 2301.00543
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free

home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2025 - Scimetrica