| | |
| | |
Stat |
Members: 3667 Articles: 2'599'751 Articles rated: 2609
07 February 2025 |
|
| | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
Another intermediate mass black hole in a starburst galaxy?: The luminous X-ray source in NGC 3628 reappears | D.K. Strickland
; E.J.M. Colbert
; T.M. Heckman
; K.A. Weaver
; M. Dahlem
; I.R. Stevens
; | Date: |
6 Jul 2001 | Subject: | astro-ph | Abstract: | In a 52 ks-long Chandra ACIS-S observation of the nearby starburst galaxy NGC 3628, obtained to study the starburst-driven outflow from this galaxy, we have detected a very luminous (L_X = 1.1e40 erg/s in the 0.3-8.0 keV energy band) point source located at least 20 arcsec (~970 pc) from the nucleus of the galaxy. No radio, optical or near-IR counterpart to this source has been found. This is most probably the reappearance of the strongly-variable X-ray-luminous source discovered by Dahlem et al (1995), which faded by a factor >27 between December 1991 and March 1994 (at which point it had faded below the detection limit in a ROSAT HRI observation). This source is clearly a member of an enigmatic class of X-ray sources that are considerably more luminous than conventional X-ray binaries but less luminous than AGN, and which are not found at the dynamical center of the host galaxy. The Chandra spectrum is best-fit by an absorbed power law model with a photon index of Gamma = 1.8+/-0.2, similar to that seen in Galactic BH binary candidates in their hard state. Bremsstrahlung models or multi-color disk models (the favored spectral model for objects in this class based on ASCA observations) can provide statistically acceptable fits only if the data at energies E > 5 keV is ignored. This is one of the first X-ray spectra of such an object that is unambiguously that of the source alone, free from the spectral contamination by X-ray emission from the rest of the galaxy that affects previous spectral studies of these objects using ASCA. | Source: | arXiv, astro-ph/0107115 | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
|
| |
|
|
|