Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3667
Articles: 2'599'751
Articles rated: 2609

09 February 2025
 
  » arxiv » astro-ph/0107178

 Article overview



The confusion limit on astrometry with SIM
Jayadev Rajagopal ; Torsten Boeker ; Ronald J. Allen ;
Date 10 Jul 2001
Subject astro-ph
AffiliationSpace Telescope Science Institute
AbstractAn important requirement for the Space Interferometry Mission (SIM) is to carry out precision astrometry in crowded fields. This capability is crucial, for example, to accurately measure proper motions of bright stars in nearby galaxies. From such measurements, one can obtain distance estimates, explore the dynamics of these systems and measure the mass of the Milky Way itself. In this paper we investigate errors introduced by confusion, i.e. the presence of objects other than the targeted star in the SIM field of view (FOV). Using existing HST images of fields in M31, the LMC and the Galaxy we simulate the background within the SIM FOV and estimate the errors in the measured position of the target star. Our simulations account for the error contribution from photon statistics. We also study the effects of pointing imperfections when a field is revisited which result in errors in the measured proper motion. We use the simulations to explore the measurement accuracy of several SIM key programs which will require crowded field astrometry. In M31, the error in the absolute position of the targets could be significant for all but the brightest targets. Our results also indicate that in the case of the brightest targets in M31, and for all likely target magnitudes in the other cases, confusion-induced proper motion errors are well within the SIM requirements. However, targets which vary in flux between measurements can be susceptible to enhanced proper motion errors. We also find that for an on-source integration time of one hour, photon noise is larger than or of comparable magnitude to the confusion-induced position error for bright targets and dominates over proper motion error in most cases.
Source arXiv, astro-ph/0107178
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free

home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2025 - Scimetrica