| | |
| | |
Stat |
Members: 3667 Articles: 2'599'751 Articles rated: 2609
08 February 2025 |
|
| | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
Spallation dominated propagation of Heavy Cosmic Rays and the Local Interstellar Medium (LISM) | C. Combet
; D. Maurin
; J. Donnelly
; L. O’C Drury
; E. Vangioni-Flam
; | Date: |
1 Dec 2004 | Subject: | astro-ph | Abstract: | Measurements of ultra heavy nuclei at GeV/n energies in the galactic cosmic radiation address the question of the sources (nucleosynthetic s- and r-processes). As such, the determination of CR source abundances is a promising way to discriminate between existing nucleosynthesis models. For primary species (nuclei present and accelerated at sources), it is generally assumed that the relative propagated abundances, if they are close in mass, are not too different from their relative source abundances. Besides, the range of the correction factor associated to propagation has been estimated in weighted slab models only. Heavy CRs that are detected near Earth were accelerated from regions that are closer to us than were the light nuclei. Hence, the geometry of sources in the Solar neighbourhood, and as equally important, the geometry of gas in the same region, must be taken into account. In this paper, a two zone diffusion model is used, and as was previously investigated for radioactive species, we report here on the impact of the local interstellar medium (LISM) feature (under-dense medium over a scale ~100 pc) on primary and secondary stable nuclei propagated abundances. Going down to Fe nuclei, the connection between heavy and light abundances is also inspected. A general trend is found that decreases the UHCR source abundances relative to the HCR ones. This could have an impact on the level of r-process required to reproduce the data. | Source: | arXiv, astro-ph/0412015 | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
|
| |
|
|
|