| | |
| | |
Stat |
Members: 3657 Articles: 2'599'751 Articles rated: 2609
06 October 2024 |
|
| | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
Properties of Resolved Star Clusters in M51 | Myung Gyoon Lee
; Rupali Chandar
; Bradley C. Whitmore
; | Date: |
5 Oct 2005 | Affiliation: | Seoul National Univ.), Rupali Chandar (STScI), and Bradley C. Whitmore (STScI | Abstract: | We present a study of compact star clusters in the nearby pair of interacting galaxies NGC 5194/95 (M51), based on multifilter Hubble Space Telescope WFPC2 archival images. We have detected ~400 isolated clusters. Our requirement that clusters be detected based only on their morphology results in the selection of relatively isolated objects, and we estimate that we are missing the majority (by a factor 4-6) of <10 Myr clusters due to crowding. Hence we focus on the cluster population older than 10 Myr. An age distribution shows a broad peak between 100-500 Myr, which is consistent with the crossing times of NGC 5195 through the NGC 5194 disk estimated in both single and multiple-passage dynamical models. We estimate that the peak contains approximately 2.2-2.5 times more clusters than expected from a constant rate of cluster formation over this time interval. We estimate the effective radii of our sample clusters and find a median value of 3-4 pc. Additionally, we see correlations of increasing cluster size with cluster mass (with a best fit slope of 0.14pm0.03) at the 4sigma level, and with cluster age (0.06pm0.02) at the 3sigma level. Finally, we report for the first time the discovery of faint, extended star clusters in the companion, NGC 5195, an SB0 galaxy. These have red [(V-I)>1.0] colors, effective radii >7 pc, and are scattered over the disk of NGC 5195. Our results indicate that NGC 5195 is therefore currently the third known barred lenticular galaxy to have formed so-called "faint fuzzy" star clusters. (abridged) | Source: | arXiv, astro-ph/0510144 | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
|
| |
|
|
|