Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3657
Articles: 2'599'751
Articles rated: 2609

14 October 2024
 
  » arxiv » astro-ph/0510185

 Article overview



A deep XMM-Newton observation of the ultraluminous X-ray source HoII X-1 : the case against a 1000 solar mass black hole
M.R. Goad ; T.P. Roberts ; J.N. Reeves ; P.Uttley ;
Date 6 Oct 2005
Subject astro-ph
Affiliation2,3), P.Uttley ( University of Leicester, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, John Hopkins University
AbstractWe present results from a 112 ks long look by XMM-Newton at the ultraluminous X-ray source (ULX) Holmberg II X-1, long thought to be the one of best candidates for the missing class of intermediate mass black holes (IMBHs). Our data comprises the first high quality XMM-Newton/RGS spectrum of an ULX, and an XMM-Newton/EPIC spectrum with unprecedented signal-to-noise. A detailed timing analysis shows that any variability on time-scales of minutes to hours is very weak (< few per cent fractional rms), though larger amplitude variations on much shorter time-scales could be hidden by photon counting statistics. This result suggests that if Ho II X-1 harbours an IMBH, then we are observing this source in a highly unusual and atypical state when compared with the known variability behaviour of other accreting systems of large mass. Moreover unlike Galactic X-ray binaries, our spectral analysis indicates the possible presence of an optically-thick low temperature corona. Taken together our timing and spectral analysis suggests that the compact companion is most-likely a high luminosity analogue of black hole binary systems similar to GRS 1915+105, the Galactic microquasar, harbouring a compact object of mass no greater than 100 solar masses.
Source arXiv, astro-ph/0510185
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free

home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica