|
| | | | |
| | | |
| Stat |
Members: 3657
Articles: 2'599'751
Articles rated: 2609
14 October 2024 |
|
| | | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
|
Dark Energy: The Observational Challenge | | David H. Weinberg
; | | Date: |
6 Oct 2005 | | Abstract: | Nearly all proposed tests for the nature of dark energy measure some combination of four fundamental observables: the Hubble parameter H(z), the distance-redshift relation d(z), the age-redshift relation t(z), or the linear growth factor D_1(z). I discuss the sensitivity of these observables to the value and redshift history of the equation of state parameter w, emphasizing where these different observables are and are not complementary. Demonstrating time-variability of w is difficult in most cases because dark energy is dynamically insignificant at high redshift. Time-variability in which dark energy tracks the matter density at high redshift and changes to a cosmological constant at low redshift is {it relatively} easy to detect. However, even a sharp transition of this sort at z_c=1 produces only percent-level differences in d(z) or D_1(z) over the redshift range 0.4 < z < 1.8$, relative to the closest constant-w model. Estimates of D_1(z) or H(z) at higher redshift, potentially achievable with the Ly-alpha forest, galaxy redshift surveys, and the CMB power spectrum, can add substantial leverage on such models, given precise distance constraints at z < 2. The most promising routes to obtaining sub-percent precision on dark energy observables are space-based studies of Type Ia supernovae, which measure d(z) directly, and of weak gravitational lensing, which is sensitive to d(z), D_1(z), and H(z). | | Source: | arXiv, astro-ph/0510196 | | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites | |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
|
| |
|
|
|
REGISTER