| | |
| | |
Stat |
Members: 3665 Articles: 2'599'751 Articles rated: 2609
17 January 2025 |
|
| | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
Supporting evidence for the signature of the innermost stable circular orbit in Rossi X-ray data from 4U1636-536 | Didier Barret
; Jean-Francois Olive
; M. Coleman Miller
; | Date: |
10 Jan 2007 | Abstract: | Analysis of archival RXTE data on neutron stars binaries has shown that for several sources the quality factor (Q) of the lower kilohertz Quasi-Periodic Oscillations (QPO) drops sharply beyond a certain frequency. This is one possible signature of the approach to the general relativistic innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO), but the implications of such an interpretation for strong gravity and dense matter are important enough that it is essential to explore alternate explanations. In this spirit, Mendez has recently proposed that Q depends fundamentally on mass accretion rate (as measured by spectral hardness) rather than the frequency of the QPO. We test this hypothesis for 4U1636-536 by measuring precisely spectral colors simultaneously with the lower QPO frequency and Q after correction for the frequency drift, over a data set spanning eight years of RXTE observations. We find that in this source there is no correlation between Q and spectral hardness. In particular, no apparent changes in hardness are observed when Q reaches its maximum before dropping off. We perform a similar analysis on 4U1608-522; another source showing a sharp drop in the quality factor of its lower kHz QPO. We find that for this source, positive and negative correlations are observed between spectral hardness, frequency and Q. Consequently, if we are to search for a common explanation for the sharp drop in the quality factor seen in both sources, the spectral hardness is not a good candidate for the independent variable whereas the frequency remains. Therefore, we conclude that the ISCO explanation is viable for 4U1636-536, and thus possibly for others. | Source: | arXiv, astro-ph/0701312 | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
|
| |
|
|
|