| | |
| | |
Stat |
Members: 3665 Articles: 2'599'751 Articles rated: 2609
25 January 2025 |
|
| | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
A unifying framework for self-consistent gravitational lensing and stellar dynamics analyses of early-type galaxies | Matteo Barnabe’
; Leon V.E. Koopmans
; | Date: |
12 Jan 2007 | Abstract: | Gravitational lensing and stellar dynamics are two independent methods, based solely on gravity, to study the mass distributions of galaxies. Both methods suffer from degeneracies, however, that are difficult to break. In this paper, we present a new framework that self-consistently unifies gravitational lensing and stellar dynamics. This approach breaks some of classical degeneracies that have limited their individual usage, in particular in the study of high-redshift galaxies. The methodology is based on the premise that, for any given galaxy potential, the mapping of both the unknown lensed source brightness distribution and the stellar phase-space distribution function on to the photometric and kinematic observables, can be cast as a single set of coupled linear equations. This set of linear equations is solved, maximizing the likelihood penalty function. The evidence penalty function, as derived from Bayesian statistics, subsequently allows the best potential-model parameters to be found and potential-model families, or other model assumptions (e.g. PSF), to be quantitatively ranked. We have implemented a fast algorithm that solves for the maximum-likelihood pixelized lensed source brightness distribution and the two-integral stellar phase-space distribution function f(E, L_z), assuming axisymmetric potentials. To make the method practical, we have devised a new Monte-Carlo approach to Schwarzschild’s orbital superposition method, based on the superposition of two-integral (E and L_z) toroidal components, to find the maximum-likelihood two-integral distribution function in a matter of seconds in any axisymmetric potential. The non-linear parameters of the potential are subsequently found through a hybrid MCMC and Simplex optimization of the evidence. (Abridged) | Source: | arXiv, astro-ph/0701372 | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
|
| |
|
|
|