| | |
| | |
Stat |
Members: 3665 Articles: 2'599'751 Articles rated: 2609
25 January 2025 |
|
| | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
Measuring PAH Emission in Ultradeep Spitzer IRS Spectroscopy of High Redshift IR Luminous Galaxies | H. I. Teplitz
; V. Desai
; L. Armus
; R. Chary
; J. A. Marshall
; J.W. Colbert
; D.T. Frayer
; A. Pope
; A. Blain
; H. Spoon
; V. Charmandaris
; D. Scott
; | Date: |
15 Jan 2007 | Abstract: | The study of the dominant population of high redshift IR-luminous galaxies (10^11 - 10^12 Lsun at 1<z<3), requires observation of sources at the ~0.1 mJy level in the mid-IR. We present the deepest spectra taken to date with the Infrared Spectrograph (IRS) on the Spitzer Space Telescope. We targeted two faint (f24~0.15 mJy) sources in the Southern GOODS field at z=1.09 and z=2.69. Spectra of the lower redshift target were taken in the observed-frame 8--21 micron range, while the spectrum of the higher redshift target covered 21--37 microns. We also present the spectra of two secondary sources within the slit. We detect strong PAH emission in all four targets, and compare the spectra to those of local galaxies observed by the IRS. The z=1.09 source appears to be a typical, star-formation dominated IR-luminous galaxy, while the z=2.69 source is a composite source with strong star formation and a prominent AGN. The IRAC colors of this source show no evidence of rest-frame near-infrared stellar photospheric emission. We demonstrate that an AGN which contributes only a small (~10%) fraction of the bolometric luminosity can produce enough hot dust emission to overwhelm the near-IR photospheric emission from stars. Such sources would be excluded from photometric surveys which rely on the near-IR bump to identify starbursts, leading to an underestimate of the star formation rate density. | Source: | arXiv, astro-ph/0701409 | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
|
| |
|
|
|