Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3662
Articles: 2'599'751
Articles rated: 2609

14 December 2024
 
  » arxiv » astro-ph/0701515

 Article overview



On the faint end of the high redshift AGN luminosity function
Francesco Shankar ; Smita Mathur ;
Date 18 Jan 2007
AbstractUsing the results of recent optical surveys we conclude that the {it non}-detection of quasars down to faint magnitudes implies a significant flattening of the high redshift (z~6) optical active galactic nuclei (AGN) luminosity function for M_{1450}>-26.7. We find that all the data are consistent with a faint-end slope for the optical AGN luminosity function of eta=-2.2 and eta=-2.8, at the 90% and 99% confidence level respectively, flatter than the bright-end slope of eta’~ -3.2. We also show that X-ray deep surveys have probed even fainter magnitudes than the optical ones yielding more significant constraints on the shallow faint-end slope of the optical luminosity function. The inclusion of Type II AGN candidates, detected in the Chandra deep fields, hints towards an higher normalization for the total AGN luminosity function, if these sources lie at 5<z <6.5. We then discuss simple theoretical models of AGN formation and evolution in the context of cold dark matter cosmology. The comparison with the total AGN luminosity function favors a redshift-dependent relation between black hole and dark matter halo masses of the type M_BH~M_ halo^alpha, with 1.3< alpha< 1.7, compatible with independent studies from statistical analysis and rotation curve measurements. Finally we compute the quasar contribution to reionization to be <9% at z~6, up to ~30% when integrated within 5.5< z<6.5, significantly smaller than that from galaxies.
Source arXiv, astro-ph/0701515
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free

home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica