| | |
| | |
Stat |
Members: 3662 Articles: 2'599'751 Articles rated: 2609
11 December 2024 |
|
| | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
The X-ray and Radio Connection in Low-luminosity Active Nuclei | F. Panessa
; X. Barcons
; L. Bassani
; M. Cappi
; F. J. Carrera
; L.C. Ho
; S. Pellegrini
; | Date: |
18 Jan 2007 | Abstract: | We present the results of the correlation between the nuclear 2-10 keV X-ray and radio (at 2cm, 6cm and 20cm) luminosities for a well defined sample of local Seyfert galaxies. We use a sample of low luminosity radio galaxies (LLRGs) for comparison. In both Seyfert and LLRGs samples, X-ray and radio luminosities are significantly correlated over 8 orders of magnitude, indicating that the X-ray and radio emission sources are strongly coupled. Moreover, both samples show a similar regression slope, L(X)$propto$ L(R)^(0.97), but Seyfert galaxies are three orders of magnitude less luminous in the radio band than LLRGs. This suggests that either similar physical mechanisms are responsible for the observed emission or a combination of different mechanisms ends up producing a similar correlation slope. Indeed, the common belief for LLRG is that both the X-ray and radio emission are likely dominated by a relativistic jet component, while in Seyfert galaxies the X-ray emission probably arises from a disk-corona system and the radio emission is attributed to a jet/outflow component. We investigate the radio loudness issue in the two samples and find that the Seyfert galaxies and the LLRGs show a different distribution of the radio loudness parameters. No correlation is found between the luminosity and the radio loudness, however the latter is related to the black hole mass and anti-correlated with the Eddington ratio. The dichotomy in the radio loudness between Seyfert and LLRG observed down to low Eddington ratios, L(2-10)/L(Edd) $sim$ 10^(-8), does not support the idea that the origin of the radio loudness is due to a switch in the accretion mode. | Source: | arXiv, astro-ph/0701546 | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
|
| |
|
|
|