Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3662
Articles: 2'599'751
Articles rated: 2609

12 December 2024
 
  » arxiv » astro-ph/0701589

 Article overview



The Sloan Lens ACS Survey. IV: the mass density profile of early-type galaxies out to 100 effective radii
Raphael Gavazzi ; Tommaso Treu ; Jason D. Rhodes ; Leon Ve Koopmans ; Adam S. Bolton ; Scott Burles ; Richard Massey ; Leonidas A. Moustakas ;
Date 20 Jan 2007
AbstractWe present a weak gravitational lensing analysis of 22 early-type strong lens galaxies, based on deep HST images obtained as part of the Sloan Lens ACS Survey. Using the most advanced techniques to control systematic uncertainties related to the variable PSF and charge transfer efficiency of the ACS, we detect weak lensing signal out to 300 kpc/h. We analyze blank control fields from the COSMOS survey in the same manner, inferring that the residual systematic uncertainty in the tangential shear is <0.3%. A joint strong and weak lensing analysis shows that the average total mass density profile is consistent with isothermal over two decades in radius (3-300 kpc/h, approximately 1-100 Reff). This finding extends by over an order of magnitude in radius previous results, based on strong lensing and/or stellar dynamics, that luminous and dark component ``conspire’’ to form an isothermal mass distribution. In order to disentangle the contributions of luminous and dark matter, we fit a two-component mass model (R^1/4 + NFW) to the weak and strong lensing constraints. It provides a good fit to the data with only two free parameters; i) the average stellar mass-to-light ratio M_*/L_V=4.42 +- 0.46 hMo/Lo, in agreement with that expected for an old stellar population; ii) the average virial mass-to-light ratio M_vir/L_V = 354+156-127 hMo/Lo. [abridged]
Source arXiv, astro-ph/0701589
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free

home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica