Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3665
Articles: 2'599'751
Articles rated: 2609

19 January 2025
 
  » arxiv » astro-ph/0701630

 Article overview



A new superwind galaxy: XMM-Newton observations of NGC 6810
David K. Strickland ;
Date 22 Jan 2007
AbstractWe present the first imaging X-ray observation of the highly inclined (i = 78 deg) Sab Seyfert 2 galaxy NGC 6810 using XMM-Newton, which reveals soft X-ray emission that extends out to a projected height of ~7 kpc away from the plane of the galaxy. The soft X-ray emission beyond the optical disk of the galaxy is most plausibly extra-planar, although it could instead come from large galactic radius. This extended X-ray emission is spatially associated with diffuse H-alpha emission, in particular with a prominent 5-kpc-long H-alpha filament on the north-west of the disk. A fraction <~35% of the total soft X-ray emission of the galaxy arises from projected heights z > 2 kpc. Within the optical disk of the galaxy the soft X-ray emission is associated with the star-forming regions visible in ground-based H-alpha and XMM-Newton Optical Monitor near-UV imaging. The temperature, super-Solar alpha-element-to-iron abundance ratio, soft X-ray/H-alpha correlation, and X-ray to far-IR flux ratio of NGC 6810 are all consistent with local starbursts with winds, although the large base radius of the outflow would make NGC 6810 one of the few ``disk-wide’’ superwinds currently known. Hard X-ray emission from NGC 6810 is weak, and the total E=2-10 keV luminosity and spectral shape are consistent with the expected level of X-ray binary emission from the old and young stellar populations. The X-ray observations provide no evidence of any AGN activity. We find that the optical, IR and radio properties of NGC 6810 are all consistent with a starburst galaxy, and that the old classification of this galaxy as a Seyfert 2 galaxy is probably incorrect.
Source arXiv, astro-ph/0701630
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free

home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2025 - Scimetrica