Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3665
Articles: 2'599'751
Articles rated: 2609

23 January 2025
 
  » arxiv » astro-ph/0701668

 Article overview



The HI content of star-forming galaxies at z = 0.24
Philip Lah ; Jayaram N. Chengalur ; Frank H. Briggs ; Matthew Colless ; Roberto De Propris ; Michael B. Pracy ; W. J. G. de Blok ; Shinobu S. Fujita ; Masaru Ajiki ; Yasuhiro Shioya ; Tohru Nagao ; Takashi Murayama ; Yoshiaki Taniguchi ; Masafumi Yagi ; Sadanori Okamura ;
Date 24 Jan 2007
AbstractWe use observations from the Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope (GMRT) to measure the atomic hydrogen gas content of star-forming galaxies at z = 0.24 (i.e. a look-backtime of ~3 Gyr). The sample of galaxies studied were selected from Halpha-emitting field galaxies detected in a narrow-band imaging survey with the Subaru Telescope. The Anglo-Australian Telescope was used to obtain precise optical redshifts for these galaxies. We then coadded the HI 21 cm emission signal for all the galaxies within the GMRT spectral line data cube.
From the coadded signal of 121 galaxies, we measure an average atomic hydrogen gas mass of (2.26 +- 0.90)*10^9 solar masses. We translate this HI signal into a cosmic density of neutral gas at z = 0.24 of Omega_gas = (0.91 +- 0.42)*10^-3. This is the current highest redshift at which Omega_gas has been constrained from 21 cm emission and our value is consistent with that estimated from damped Lyman-alpha systems around this redshift. We also find that the correlations between the Halpha luminosity and the radio continuum luminosity and between the star formation rate and the HI gas content in star-forming galaxies at z = 0.24 are consistent with the correlations found at z = 0. These two results suggest that the star formation mechanisms in field galaxies ~3 Gyr ago were not substantially different from the present, even though the star formation rate is 3 times higher.
Source arXiv, astro-ph/0701668
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free

home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2025 - Scimetrica