|
| | | | |
| | | |
| Stat |
Members: 3657
Articles: 2'599'751
Articles rated: 2609
14 October 2024 |
|
| | | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
|
CCD Photometry of the Globular Cluster M5. I. The Color-Magnitude Diagram and Luminosity Functions | | Eric L. Sandquist
; Michael Bolte
; Peter B. Stetson
; | | Date: |
17 May 1996 | | Abstract: | We present new BVI photometry for the halo globular cluster M5, and examine the B- and I-band luminosity functions (LFs), based on over 20,000 stars. We do not see evidence in the LF of a ``subgiant excess’’ or of a discrepancy in the relative numbers of stars on the red-giant branch and main sequence, both of which have been claimed in more metal-poor clusters. Inclusion of alpha-element enhancements improves the agreement between the observed and predicted positions of the ``red-giant bump’’. Using the Delta V_{TO}^{HB} method, we conclude that the clusters M5, Palomar 5, M4, NGC 288, NGC 362, NGC 1261, NGC 1851 and NGC 2808 are the same age at the level of about 1.5 Gyr, with the possible exception of NGC 288 (older by 3.5pm 1.5 if the reddest NGC 288 HB stars are on the zero-age horizontal branch). Even with NGC 288 set aside, the large range in HB morphology in the remaining clusters appears to eliminate age as the sole second parameter determining HB morphology in the case of constant mass loss between RGB and HB. We are unable to chose between the two competing values for M5’s (absolute) metallicity: [Fe/H] = -1.40 (Zinn & West 1984) and -1.17 (Sneden et al. 1992). This level of discrepancy has a signifcant effect on the derivation of the distance modulus and absolute age of M5. From theoretical isochrones and luminosity functions, we find an absolute age for M5 of 13.5 pm 1 Gyr (internal error, assuming perfect models and no [M/H] error) for the Zinn & West abundance scale and 11 pm 1 Gyr for the higher abundance value. | | Source: | arXiv, astro-ph/9605101 | | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites | |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
|
| |
|
|
|
REGISTER