Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3665
Articles: 2'599'751
Articles rated: 2609

19 January 2025
 
  » arxiv » cond-mat/0701466

 Article overview



Comparison of molecular static linear polarizability : bare against screened
Rajendra R. Zope ; Tunna Baruah ; Mark R. Pederson ; Brett I. Dunlap ;
Date 19 Jan 2007
Subject Other
AbstractThe sum-over-states (SOS) polarizabilities are calculated within the approximate independent electron theories such as the Hartree-Fock approximation and density functional models using the eigenvalues and orbitals obtained from the self-consistent solution of single-particle equations. The SOS polarizabilities are then compared with those calculated using the finite-field method within three widely used single particle models: (1) the Hartree-Fock (HF) method, (2) the three parameter hybrid generalized gradient approximation (B3LYP), and (3) the parameter free generalized gradient approximation due to Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE). The comparison is carried out for polarizabilities of 142 molecules calculated using the 6-311++G(d,p) orbital basis at the geometries optimized at the B3LYP/6-311G** level. The results show that the SOS method almost always overestimate the FF polarizabilities in the PBE and B3LYP models. This trend is reversed in the HF method however exception to the trend do exist. The mean absolute errors (MAE) in the screened (FF) and unscreened (SOS) polarizability are 0.78 AA$^3$ for the HF method, 1.87 AA$^3$ for the B3LYP, and 3.44 AA$^3$ for the PBE-GGA. The Hartree-Fock approximation predicts finite-field polarizabilities that are smaller than those predicted by the PBE and B3LYP models. Finally, a simple scheme is devised to obtain FF quality estimate of polarizability from those obtained using the SOS method by exploiting the observed trends.
Source arXiv, cond-mat/0701466
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free

home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2025 - Scimetrica