|
| | | | |
| | | |
| Stat |
Members: 3662
Articles: 2'599'751
Articles rated: 2609
14 December 2024 |
|
| | | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
|
Comment on ``Consistent Sets Yield Contrary Inferences in Quantum Theory'' | | Robert B. Griffiths
; James B. Hartle
; | | Date: |
3 Oct 1997 | | Journal: | Phys.Rev.Lett. 81 (1998) 1981 | | Subject: | gr-qc hep-th quant-ph | | Affiliation: | Carnegie-Mellon University) and James B. Hartle (University of California, Santa Barbara | | Abstract: | In a recent paper Kent has pointed out that in consistent histories quantum theory it is possible, given initial and final states, to construct two different consistent families of histories, in each of which there is a proposition that can be inferred with probability one, and such that the projectors representing these two propositions are mutually orthogonal. In this note we stress that, according to the rules of consistent history reasoning two such propositions are not contrary in the usual logical sense namely, that one can infer that if one is true then the other is false, and both could be false. No single consistent family contains both propositions, together with the initial and final states, and hence the propositions cannot be logically compared. Consistent histories quantum theory is logically consistent, consistent with experiment as far as is known, consistent with the usual quantum predictions for measurements, and applicable to the most general physical systems. It may not be the only theory with these properties, but in our opinion, it is the most promising among present possibilities. | | Source: | arXiv, gr-qc/9710025 | | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites | |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
|
| |
|
|
|
REGISTER