| | |
| | |
Stat |
Members: 3665 Articles: 2'599'751 Articles rated: 2609
25 January 2025 |
|
| | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
Regularity Properties and Pathologies of Position-Space Renormalization-Group Transformations | A.C.D. van Enter
; R. Fernandez
; A.D. Sokal
; | Date: |
22 Oct 1992 | Journal: | J. Statist. Phys. 72 (1994) 879 | Subject: | hep-lat | Abstract: | We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism, and prove some rigorous theorems on the regularity properties and possible pathologies of the RG map. Regarding regularity, we show that the RG map, defined on a suitable space of interactions (= formal Hamiltonians), is always single-valued and Lipschitz continuous on its domain of definition. This rules out a recently proposed scenario for the RG description of first-order phase transitions. On the pathological side, we make rigorous some arguments of Griffiths, Pearce and Israel, and prove in several cases that the renormalized measure is not a Gibbs measure for any reasonable interaction. This means that the RG map is ill-defined, and that the conventional RG description of first-order phase transitions is not universally valid. For decimation or Kadanoff transformations applied to the Ising model in dimension $d ge 3$, these pathologies occur in a full neighborhood $eta > eta_0 ,|h| < epsilon(eta) }$ of the low-temperature part of the first-order phase-transition surface. For block-averaging transformations applied to the Ising model in dimension $d ge 2$, the pathologies occur at low temperatures for arbitrary magnetic-field strength. Pathologies may also occur in the critical region for Ising models in dimension $d ge 4$. We discuss in detail the distinction between Gibbsian and non-Gibbsian measures, and give a rather complete catalogue of the known examples. Finally, we discuss the heuristic and numerical evidence on RG pathologies in the light of our rigorous theorems. | Source: | arXiv, hep-lat/9210032 | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
|
| |
|
|
|