Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'500'096
Articles rated: 2609

19 April 2024
 
  » » review 07100049

 Science-advisor review


SCIENCE-ADVISOR - review - "Important Factual Errors..."
Science-advisor.net review 07100049    * Rate this comment.
Article reference: Superconductivity due to co-operative Kondo effect in Pu 115’s.
Review title: Important Factual Errors
Reviewer: reviewer927
Date: 13 October 2007 at 16:14 GMT.
Read this article?: Evidence of poor reserch
Comment:

Strong correlated electrons?  The correlations are medium to weak, at BEST.

 I think a simple explanation for these so called anomalous properties of the PuCoGa$_5$ and PuRhGa$_5$ compounds is readily avaliable...  TO ANYONE WITH A BRANE!  You should be aware gravitational forces are HUGE between brane point particles.  I can tell you need to increase you are brain mass.

Why would you use the sympletic large-N approach, you said yourself there is a large N limit!  Honestly, how can you expect to write about SUPERconductivity when you clearly do not understand normal conductivity.

If you want help I can explain this to you, give me a ring 520.405.5258 

 

P.S. Where you wrote "The symmetry of the order parameter" I believe you meant to say "The antisymmetry of the same parameter" This will bring out the conduction channels to a higher "Degree" so to speak.  Welcome :D


important: 0,    broad interest: 0.5,    readable: 5,    new: 1,    correct: 0,   Global: 0
Article rating: 1.08/5





ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica