Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'504'928
Articles rated: 2609

26 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » arxiv.0704.2637

 Article overview



Observational consequences of the hypothesized helium rich stellar population in Omega Centauri
G. Newsham ; D. M. Terndrup ;
Date 20 Apr 2007
Subject Astrophysics (astro-ph)
AbstractIn response to the proposed high helium content stars as an explanation for the double main sequence observed in Omega Centauri, we investigated the consequences of such stars elsewhere on the color-magnitude diagram. We concentrated on the horizontal branch where the effects of high helium are expected to show themselves more clearly. In the process, we developed a procedure for comparing the mass loss suffered by differing stellar populations in a physically motivated manner. High helium stars in the numbers proposed seem absent from the horizontal branch of Omega Centauri unless their mass loss history is very different from that of the majority metal-poor stars. It is possible to generate a double main sequence with existing Omega Centauri stars via accretion of helium rich pollution consistent with the latest AGB ejecta theoretical yields, and such polluted stars are consistent with the observed HB morphology of Omega Centauri. Polluted models are consistent with observed merging of the main sequences as opposed to our models of helium rich stars. Using the (B-R)/(B+V+R) statistic, we find that the high helium bMS stars require an age difference compared to the rMS stars that is too great, whereas the pollution scenario stars have no such conflict for inferred Omega Centauri mass losses.
Source arXiv, arxiv.0704.2637
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica