| | |
| | |
Stat |
Members: 3645 Articles: 2'506'133 Articles rated: 2609
26 April 2024 |
|
| | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
GRB060602B = Swift J1749.4-2807: an unusual transiently accreting neutron-star X-ray binary | Rudy Wijnands
; Evert Rol
; Ed M. Cackett
; Rhaana L.C. Starling
; Ron A. Remillard
; | Date: |
1 Sep 2007 | Abstract: | We present an analysis of the Swift BAT and XRT data of GRB060602B, which is
most likely an accreting neutron star in a binary system and not a gamma-ray
burst. Our analysis shows that the BAT burst spectrum is consistent with a
thermonuclear flash (type-I X-ray burst) from the surface of an accreting
neutron star in a binary system. The X-ray binary nature is further confirmed
by the report of a detection of a faint point source at the position of the XRT
counterpart of the burst in archival XMM-Newton data approximately 6 years
before the burst and in more recent XMM-Newton data obtained at the end of
September 2006 (nearly 4 months after the burst). Since the source is very
likely not a gamma-ray burst, we rename the source Swift J1749.4-2807, based on
the Swift/BAT discovery coordinates. Using the BAT data of the type-I X-ray
burst we determined that the source is at most at a distance of 6.7+-1.3 kpc.
For a transiently accreting X-ray binary its soft X-ray behaviour is atypical:
its 2-10 keV X-ray luminosity (as measured using the Swift/XRT data) decreased
by nearly 3 orders of magnitude in about 1 day, much faster than what is
usually seen for X-ray transients. If the earlier phases of the outburst also
evolved this rapidly, then many similar systems might remain undiscovered
because the X-rays are difficult to detect and the type-I X-ray bursts might be
missed by all sky surveying instruments. This source might be part of a class
of very-fast transient low-mass X-ray binary systems of which there may be a
significant population in our Galaxy. | Source: | arXiv, 0709.0061 | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
|
| |
|
|
|
| News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
| |