Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'506'133
Articles rated: 2609

27 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » cond-mat/0111099

 Article overview



Brownian Dynamics Studies on DNA Gel Electrophoresis. I. Numerical Method and Quasi-Periodic Behavior of Elongation-Contraction Motions
Ryuzo Azuma ; Hajime Takayama ;
Date 7 Nov 2001
Subject Soft Condensed Matter; Statistical Mechanics | cond-mat.soft cond-mat.stat-mech
AbstractDynamics of individual DNA undergoing constant field gel electrophoresis (CFGE) is studied by a Brownian dynamics (BD) simulation method which we have developed. The method simulates electrophoresis of DNA in a 3 dimensional (3D) space by a chain of electrolyte beads of hard spheres. Under the constraint that the separation of each pair of bonded beads is restricted to be less than a certain fixed value, as well as with the excluded volume effect, the Langevin equation of motion for the beads is solved by means of the Lagrangian multiplier method. The resultant mobilities, $mu$, as a function of the electric field coincide satisfactorily with the corresponding experimental results, once the time, the length and the field of the simulation are properly scaled. In relatively strong fields quasi-periodic behavior is found in the chain dynamics, and is examined through the time evolution of the radius of the longer principal axis, $R_l(t)$. It is found that the mean width of a peak in $R_l(t)$, or a period of one elongation-contraction process of the chain, is proportional to the number of beads in the chain, $M$, while the mean period between two such adjacent peaks is proportional to $M^0$ for large $M$. These results, combined with the observation that the chain moves to the field direction by the distance proportional to $M$ in each elongation-contraction motion, yield $mu propto M^0$. This explains why CFGE cannot separate DNA according to their size $L (propto M)$ for large $L$.
Source arXiv, cond-mat/0111099
Other source [GID 706703] cond-mat/0111099
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica