| | |
| | |
Stat |
Members: 3645 Articles: 2'506'133 Articles rated: 2609
26 April 2024 |
|
| | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
The Lick AGN Monitoring Project: Alternate Routes to a Broad-line Region Radius | Jenny E. Greene
; Carol E. Hood
; Aaron J. Barth
; Vardha N. Bennert
; Misty C. Bentz
; Alexei V. Filippenko
; Elinor Gates
; Matthew A. Malkan
; Tommaso Treu
; Jonelle L. Walsh
; Jong-Hak Woo
; | Date: |
2 Sep 2010 | Abstract: | It is now possible to estimate black hole masses across cosmic time, using
broad emission lines in active galaxies. This technique informs our views of
how galaxies and their central black holes coevolve. Unfortunately, there are
many outstanding uncertainties associated with these "virial" mass estimates.
One of these comes from using the accretion luminosity to infer a size for the
broad-line region. Incorporating the new sample of low-luminosity active
galaxies from our recent monitoring campaign at Lick Observatory, we
recalibrate the radius-luminosity relation with tracers of the accretion
luminosity other than the optical continuum. We find that the radius of the
broad-line region scales as the square root of the X-ray and Hbeta
luminosities, in agreement with recent optical studies. On the other hand, the
scaling appears to be marginally steeper with narrow-line luminosities. This is
consistent with a previously observed decrease in the ratio of narrow-line to
X-ray luminosity with increasing total luminosity. The radius of the broad-line
region correlates most tightly with Hbeta luminosity, while the X-ray and
narrow-line relations both have comparable scatter of a factor of two. These
correlations provide useful alternative virial BH masses in objects with no
detectable optical/UV continuum emission, such as high-redshift galaxies with
broad emission lines, radio-loud objects, or local active galaxies with
galaxy-dominated continua. | Source: | arXiv, 1009.0532 | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
|
| |
|
|
|
| News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
| |