Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'506'133
Articles rated: 2609

27 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » 1109.0869

 Article overview



Verification of the Kepler Input Catalog from Asteroseismology of Solar-type Stars
G. A. Verner ; W. J. Chaplin ; S. Basu ; T. M. Brown ; S. Hekker ; D. Huber ; C. Karoff ; S. Mathur ; T. S. Metcalfe ; B. Mosser ; P.-O. Quirion ; T. Appourchaux ; T. R. Bedding ; H. Bruntt ; T. L. Campante ; Y. Elsworth ; R. A. García ; R. Handberg ; C. Régulo ; I. W. Roxburgh ; D. Stello ; J. Christensen-Dalsgaard ; R. L. Gilliland ; S. D. Kawaler ; H. Kjeldsen ; C. Allen ; B. D. Clarke ; F. R. Girouard ;
Date 5 Sep 2011
AbstractWe calculate precise stellar radii and surface gravities from the asteroseismic analysis of over 500 solar-type pulsating stars observed by the Kepler space telescope. These physical stellar properties are compared with those given in the Kepler Input Catalog (KIC), determined from ground-based multi-color photometry. For the stars in our sample, we find general agreement but we detect an average overestimation bias of 0.23 dex in the KIC determination of log (g) for stars with log (g)_KIC > 4.0 dex, and a resultant underestimation bias of up to 50% in the KIC radii estimates for stars with R_KIC < 2 R sun. Part of the difference may arise from selection bias in the asteroseismic sample; nevertheless, this result implies there may be fewer stars characterized in the KIC with R ~ 1 R sun than is suggested by the physical properties in the KIC. Furthermore, if the radius estimates are taken from the KIC for these affected stars and then used to calculate the size of transiting planets, a similar underestimation bias may be applied to the planetary radii.
Source arXiv, 1109.0869
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica