Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'504'928
Articles rated: 2609

26 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » 1109.3198

 Article overview



Spin-Orbit Alignment for the Circumbinary Planet Host Kepler-16A
Joshua N. Winn ; Simon Albrecht ; John Asher Johnson ; Guillermo Torres ; William D. Cochran ; Geoffrey W. Marcy ; Andrew Howard ; Howard Isaacson ; Debra Fischer ; Laurance Doyle ; William Welsh ; Joshua A. Carter ; Daniel C. Fabrycky ; Darin Ragozzine ; Samuel N. Quinn ; Avi Shporer ; Steve B. Howell ; David W. Latham ; Jerome Orosz ; Andrej Prsa ; Robert W. Slawson ; William J. Borucki ; David Koch ; Thomas Barclay ; Alan P. Boss ; Jorgen Christensen-Dalsgaard ; Forrest R. Girouard ; Jon Jenkins ; Todd C. Klaus ; Soren Meibom ; Robert L. Morris ; Dimitar Sasselov ; Martin Still ; Jeffrey Van Cleve ;
Date 14 Sep 2011
AbstractKepler-16 is an eccentric low-mass eclipsing binary with a circumbinary transiting planet. Here we investigate the angular momentum of the primary star, based on Kepler photometry and Keck spectroscopy. The primary star’s rotation period is 35.1 +/- 1.0 days, and its projected obliquity with respect to the stellar binary orbit is 1.6 +/- 2.4 degrees. Therefore the three largest sources of angular momentum---the stellar orbit, the planetary orbit, and the primary’s rotation---are all closely aligned. This finding supports a formation scenario involving accretion from a single disk. Alternatively, tides may have realigned the stars despite their relatively wide separation (0.2 AU), a hypothesis that is supported by the agreement between the measured rotation period and the "pseudosynchronous" period of tidal evolution theory. The rotation period, chromospheric activity level, and fractional light variations suggest a main-sequence age of 2-4 Gyr. Evolutionary models of low-mass stars can reproduce the observed properties of the primary star except the model radius is 2-3% too large, in contrast to the usual problem in which the models underpredict the observed radius.
Source arXiv, 1109.3198
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica