|
| | | | |
| | | |
| Stat |
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'506'133
Articles rated: 2609
26 April 2024 |
|
| | | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
|
High rigidity Forbush decreases: due to CMEs or shocks? | | Arun Babu
; H. M. Antia
; S. R. Dugad
; S. K. Gupta
; Y. Hayashi
; S. Kawakami
; P. K. Mohanty
; T. Nonaka
; A. Oshima
; P. Subramanian
; | | Date: |
19 Apr 2013 | | Abstract: | We seek to identify the primary agents causing Forbush decreases (FDs)
observed at the Earth in high rigidity cosmic rays. In particular, we ask if
such FDs are caused mainly by coronal mass ejections (CMEs) from the Sun that
are directed towards the Earth, or by their associated shocks. We use the muon
data at cutoff rigidities ranging from 14 to 24 GV from the GRAPES-3 tracking
muon telescope to identify FD events. We select those FD events that have a
reasonably clean profile, and can be reasonably well associated with an
Earth-directed CME and its associated shock. We employ two models: one that
considers the CME as the sole cause of the FD (the CME-only model) and one that
considers the shock as the only agent causing the FD (the shock-only model). We
use an extensive set of observationally determined parameters for both these
models. The only free parameter in these models is the level of MHD turbulence
in the sheath region, which mediates cosmic ray diffusion (into the CME, for
the CME-only model and across the shock sheath, for the shock-only model).
We find that good fits to the GRAPES-3 multi-rigidity data using the CME-only
model require turbulence levels in the CME sheath region that are only slightly
higher than those estimated for the quiet solar wind. On the other hand,
reasonable model fits with the shock-only model require turbulence levels in
the sheath region that are an order of magnitude higher than those in the quiet
solar wind.
This observation naturally leads to the conclusion that the Earth-directed
CMEs are the primary contributors to FDs observed in high rigidity cosmic rays. | | Source: | arXiv, 1304.5343 | | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites | |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
| |
REGISTER