|
| | | | |
| | | |
| Stat |
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'506'133
Articles rated: 2609
26 April 2024 |
|
| | | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
|
A Tidally-Stripped Stellar Component of the Magellanic Bridge | | David L. Nidever
; Antonela Monachesi
; Eric F. Bell
; Steven R. Majewski
; Ricardo R. Munoz
; Rachael L. Beaton
; | | Date: |
17 Oct 2013 | | Abstract: | Deep photometry of the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) stellar periphery (R=4
deg, 4.2 kpc) is used to study its line-of-sight depth with red clump (RC)
stars. The RC luminosity function is affected little by young (<1 Gyr)
blue-loop stars in these regions because their main-sequence counterparts are
not observed in the color magnitude diagrams. The SMC’s eastern side is found
to have a large line-of-sight depth (~23 kpc) while the western side has a much
shallower depth (~10 kpc), consistent with previous photographic plate
photometry results. We use a model SMC RC luminosity function to deconvolve the
observed RC magnitudes and construct the density function in distance for our
fields. Three of the eastern fields show a distance bimodality with one
component at the "systemic" ~67 kpc SMC distance and a second component at ~55
kpc. Our data are not reproduced well by the various extant Magellanic Cloud
and Stream simulations. However, the models predict that the known HI
Magellanic Bridge (stretching from the SMC eastward towards the LMC) has a
decreasing distance with angle from the SMC and should be seen in both the
gaseous and stellar components. From comparison with these models we conclude
that the most likely explanation for our newly identified ~55 kpc stellar
structure in the eastern SMC is a stellar counterpart of the HI Magellanic
Bridge that was tidally stripped from the SMC ~200 Myr ago during a close
encounter with the LMC. This discovery has important implications for
microlensing surveys of the SMC. | | Source: | arXiv, 1310.4824 | | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites | |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
| |
REGISTER