| | |
| | |
Stat |
Members: 3645 Articles: 2'506'133 Articles rated: 2609
26 April 2024 |
|
| | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
The massive dark halo of the compact, early-type galaxy NGC 1281 | Akın Yıldırım
; Remco van den Bosch
; Glenn van de Ven
; Aaron Dutton
; Ronald Läsker
; Bernd Husemann
; Jonelle L. Walsh
; Karl Gebhardt
; Kayhan Gültekin
; Ignacio Martín-Navarro
; | Date: |
10 Nov 2015 | Abstract: | We investigate the compact, early-type galaxy NGC 1281 with integral field
unit observations to map the stellar LOSVD out to 5 effective radii and
construct orbit-based dynamical models to constrain its dark and luminous
matter content. Under the assumption of mass-follows-light, the H-band stellar
mass-to-light ratio (M/L) is {Upsilon} = 2.7(+-0.1) {Upsilon}_{sun}, higher
than expected from our stellar population synthesis fits with either a
canonical Kroupa ({Upsilon} = 1.3 {Upsilon}_{sun}) or Salpeter ({Upsilon} =
1.7 {Upsilon}_{sun}) stellar initial mass function. Such models also cannot
reproduce the details of the LOSVD. Models with a dark halo recover the
kinematics well and indicate that NGC 1281 is dark matter dominated, making up
~ 90 per cent of the total enclosed mass within the kinematic bounds.
Parameterised as a spherical NFW profile, the dark halo mass is 11.5 <
log(M_{DM}/M_{sun}) < 11.8 and the stellar M/L is 0.6 < {Upsilon} < 1.1.
However, this stellar M/L is lower than predicted by its old stellar
population. Moreover, the halo mass within the kinematic extent is ten times
larger than expected based on {Lambda}CDM predictions, and an extrapolation
yields cluster sized dark halo masses. Adopting {Upsilon} = 1.7
{Upsilon}_{sun} yields more moderate dark halo virial masses, but these models
fit the kinematics worse. A non-NFW model might solve the discrepancy between
the unphysical consequences of the best-fitting dynamical models and models
based on more reasonable assumptions for the dark halo and stellar
mass-to-light ratio, which are disfavoured according to our parameter
estimation. | Source: | arXiv, 1511.3131 | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
|
| |
|
|
|
| News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
| |