|
| | | | |
| | | |
| Stat |
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'506'133
Articles rated: 2609
27 April 2024 |
|
| | | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
|
A definitive merger-AGN connection at z~0 with CFIS: mergers have an excess of AGN and AGN hosts are more frequently disturbed | | Sara L. Ellison
; Akshara Viswanathan
; David R. Patton
; Connor Bottrell
; Alan W. McConnachie
; Stephen Gwyn
; Jean-Charles Cuillandre
; | | Date: |
21 May 2019 | | Abstract: | The question of whether galaxy mergers are linked to the triggering of active
galactic nuclei (AGN) continues to be a topic of considerable debate. The issue
can be broken down into two distinct questions: 1) Can galaxy mergers trigger
AGN? 2) Are galaxy mergers the dominant AGN triggering mechanism? A complete
picture of the AGN-merger connection requires that both of these questions are
addressed with the same dataset. In previous work, we have shown that galaxy
mergers selected from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) show an excess of
both optically-selected, and mid-IR colour-selected AGN, demonstrating that the
answer to the first of the above questions is affirmative. Here, we use the
same optical and mid-IR AGN selection to address the second question, by
quantifying the frequency of morphological disturbances in low surface
brightness r-band images from the Canada France Imaging Survey (CFIS). Only ~30
per cent of optical AGN host galaxies are morphologically disturbed, indicating
that recent interactions are not the dominant trigger. However, almost 60 per
cent of mid-IR AGN hosts show signs of visual disturbance, indicating that
interactions play a more significant role in nuclear feeding. Both mid-IR and
optically selected AGN have interacting fractions that are a factor of two
greater than a mass and redshift matched non-AGN control sample, an excess that
increases with both AGN luminosity and host galaxy stellar mass. | | Source: | arXiv, 1905.8830 | | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites | |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
| |
REGISTER