Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'504'928
Articles rated: 2609

26 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » 1911.2440

 Article overview



Fine-grained hardness of CVP(P)--- Everything that we can prove (and nothing else)
Divesh Aggarwal ; Huck Bennett ; Alexander Golovnev ; Noah Stephens-Davidowitz ;
Date 6 Nov 2019
AbstractWe show that the Closest Vector Problem in the $ell_p$ norm ($mathrm{CVP}_p$) cannot be solved in $2^{(1-varepsilon)n}$ time for all $p otin 2mathbb{Z}$ and $varepsilon > 0$ (assuming SETH). In fact, we show that the same holds even for (1)~the approximate version of the problem (assuming a gap version of SETH); and (2) $mathrm{CVP}_p$ with preprocessing, in which we are allowed arbitrary advice about the lattice (assuming a non-uniform version of SETH). For "plain" $mathrm{CVP}_p$, the same hardness result was shown in [Bennett, Golovnev, and Stephens-Davidowitz FOCS 2017] for all but finitely many $p otin 2mathbb{Z}$, where the set of exceptions depended on $varepsilon$ and was not explicit. For the approximate and preprocessing problems, only very weak bounds were known prior to this work.
We also show that the restriction to $p otin 2mathbb{Z}$ is in some sense inherent. In particular, we show that no "natural" reduction can rule out even a $2^{3n/4}$-time algorithm for $mathrm{CVP}_2$ under SETH. For this, we prove that the possible sets of closest lattice vectors to a target in the $ell_2$ norm have quite rigid structure, which essentially prevents them from being as expressive as $3$-CNFs.
Source arXiv, 1911.2440
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica