Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'506'133
Articles rated: 2609

26 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » 2006.5745

 Article overview



An improved quantum algorithm for A-optimal projection
Shi-Jie Pan ; Lin-Chun Wan ; Hai-Ling Liu ; Qing-Le Wang ; Su-Juan Qin ; Qiao-Yan Wen ; Fei Gao ;
Date 10 Jun 2020
AbstractDimensionality reduction (DR) algorithms, which reduce the dimensionality of a given data set while preserving the information of original data set as well as possible, play an important role in machine learning and data mining. Duan et al. proposed a quantum version of A-optimal projection algorithm (AOP) for dimensionality reduction [Phys. Rev. A 99, 032311 (2019)] and claimed that the algorithm has exponential speedups on the dimensionality of the original feature space $n$ and the dimensionality of the reduced feature space $k$ over the classical algorithm. In this paper, we correct the complexity of Duan et al.’s algorithm to $O(frac{kappa^{4s}sqrt{k^s}} {epsilon^{s}}mathrm{polylog}^s (frac{mn}{epsilon}))$, where $kappa$ is the condition number of a matrix that related to the original data set, $s$ is the number of iterations, $m$ is the number of data points and $epsilon$ is the desired precision of the output state. Since the complexity has an exponential dependence on $s$, the quantum algorithm can only be beneficial for high dimensional problems with a small number of iterations $s$. To get a further speedup, we proposed an improved quantum AOP algorithm with complexity $O(frac{s kappa^6 sqrt{k}}{epsilon}mathrm{polylog}(frac{nm}{epsilon}) + frac{s^2 kappa^4}{epsilon}mathrm{polylog}(frac{kappa k}{epsilon}))$. Our algorithm achieves a nearly exponential speedup if $s$ is large and a polynomial speedup even if $s$ is a small constant compared with Duan et al.’s algorithm. Also, our algorithm shows exponential speedups in $n$ and $m$ compared with the classical algorithm when both $kappa$, $k$ and $1/epsilon$ are $O(mathrm{polylog}(nm))$.
Source arXiv, 2006.5745
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica