|
| | | | |
| | | |
| Stat |
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'506'133
Articles rated: 2609
26 April 2024 |
|
| | | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
|
Reducing Thermoelastic Noise in Gravitational-Wave Interferometers by Flattening the Light Beams | | Erika D’Ambrosio
; Richard O’Shaughnessy
; Sergey Strigin
; Kip S. Thorne
; Sergey Vyatchanin
; | | Date: |
20 Sep 2004 | | Subject: | gr-qc | | Affiliation: | California Institute of Technology, Moscow State University | | Abstract: | In the baseline design for advanced LIGO interferometers, the most serious noise source is tiny, dynamically fluctuating bumps and valleys on the faces of the arm-cavity mirrors, caused by random flow of heat in the mirrors’ sapphire substrates: so-called "thermoelastic noise". We propose replacing the interferometers’ baseline arm-cavity light beams, which have Gaussian-shaped intensity profiles, by beams with mesa-shaped profiles that are flat in their central ~7 cm of radius, and that then fall toward zero as quickly as is allowed by diffraction in LIGO’s 4 km arms. The mesa beams average the bumps and valleys much more effectively than the Gaussian beams. As a result, if the beam radii are adjusted so diffraction losses per bounce are about 10 ppm, replacing Gaussian beams by mesa beams reduces the thermoelastic noise power by about a factor 3. If other thermal noises are kept negligible, this will permit advanced LIGO to beat the Standard Quantum Limit by about a factor 1.5 over a bandwidth about equal to frequency, and the event rate for inspiraling neutron star binaries will increase by about a factor 2.5. The desired mesa beams can be produced from input, Gaussian-profile laser light, by changing the shapes of the arm cavities’ mirror faces from their baseline spherical shapes (with radii of curvature of order 60 km) to Mexican-hat (MH) shapes that have a shallow bump in the center but are otherwise much flatter in the central 10 cm than the spherical mirrors, and then flare upward strongly in the outer 6 cm, like a sombrero. We describe mesa beams and MH mirrors mathematically and we report the results of extensive modeling calculations, which show that mesa-beam interferometers are not much more sensitive than the Gaussian-beam interferometers to errors in mirror figures, positions, and orientations. | | Source: | arXiv, gr-qc/0409075 | | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites | |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
| |
REGISTER