Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'506'133
Articles rated: 2609

27 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » 2105.13543

 Article overview



Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmology from Cosmic Shear and Robustness to Data Calibration
A. Amon ; D. Gruen ; M. A. Troxel ; N. MacCrann ; S. Dodelson ; A. Choi ; C. Doux ; L. F. Secco ; S. Samuroff ; E. Krause ; J. Cordero ; J. Myles ; J. DeRose ; R. H. Wechsler ; M. Gatti ; A. Navarro-Alsina ; G. M. Bernstein ; B. Jain ; J. Blazek ; A. Alarcon ; A. Ferté ; M. Raveri ; P. Lemos ; A. Campos ; J. Prat ; C. Sánchez ; M. Jarvis ; O. Alves ; F. Andrade-Oliveira ; E. Baxter ; K. Bechtol ; M. R. Becker ; S. L. Bridle ; H. Camacho ; A. Campos ; A. Carnero Rosell ; M. Carrasco Kind ; R. Cawthon ; C. Chang ; R. Chen ; P. Chintalapati ; M. Crocce ; C. Davis ; H. T. Diehl ; A. Drlica-Wagner ; K. Eckert ; T. F. Eifler ; J. Elvin-Poole ; S. Everett ; X. Fang ; P. Fosalba ; O. Friedrich ; G. Giannini ; R. A. Gruendl ; I. Harrison ; W. G. Hartley ; K. Herner ; H. Huang ; E. M. Huff ; D. Huterer ; N. Kuropatkin ; P.-F. Leget ; A. R. Liddle ; J. McCullough ; J. Muir ; S. Pandey ; Y. Park ; A. Porredon ; A. Refregier ; R. P. Rollins ; A. Roodman ; R. Rosenfeld ; A. J. Ross ; E. S. Rykoff ; J. Sanchez ; I. Sevilla-Noarbe ; E. Sheldon ; T. Shin ; A. Troja ; I. Tutusaus ; T. N. Varga ; N. Weaverdyck ; B. Yanny ; B. Yin ; Y. Zhang ; J. Zuntz ; M. Aguena ; S. Allam ; J. Annis ; D. Bacon ; E. Bertin ; S. Bhargava ; D. Brooks ; E. Buckley-Geer ; D. L. Burke ; J. Carretero ; M. Costanzi ; L. N. da Costa ; M. E. S. Pereira ; J. De Vicente ; S. Desai ; J. P. Dietrich ; P. Doel ; I. Ferrero ; B. Flaugher ; J. Frieman ; J. García-Bellido ; E. Gaztanaga ; D. W. Gerdes ; T. Giannantonio ; J. Gschwend ; G. Gutierrez ; S. R. Hinton ; D. L. Hollowood ; K. Honscheid ; B. Hoyle ; D. J. James ; R. Kron ; K. Kuehn ; O. Lahav ; M. Lima ; H. Lin ; M. A. G. Maia ; J. L. Marshall ; P. Martini ; P. Melchior ; F. Menanteau ; R. Miquel ; J. J. Mohr ; R. Morgan ; R. L. C. Ogando ; A. Palmese ; F. Paz-Chinchón ; D. Petravick ; A. Pieres ; A. A. Plazas Malagón ; A. K. Romer ; E. Sanchez ; V. Scarpine ; M. Schubnell ; S. Serrano ; M. Smith ; M. Soares-Santos ; E. Suchyta ; G. Tarle ; D. Thomas ; C. To ; J. Weller ;
Date 28 May 2021
AbstractThis work, together with its companion paper, Secco and Samuroff et al. (2021), presents the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 cosmic shear measurements and cosmological constraints based on an analysis of over 100 million source galaxies. With the data spanning 4143 deg$^2$ on the sky, divided into four redshift bins, we produce the highest significance measurement of cosmic shear to date, with a signal-to-noise of 40. We conduct a blind analysis in the context of the $Lambda$CDM model and find a 3% constraint of the clustering amplitude, $S_8equiv sigma_8 (Omega_{ m m}/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.759^{+0.025}_{-0.023}$. A $Lambda$CDM-Optimized analysis, which safely includes smaller scale information, yields a 2% precision measurement of $S_8= 0.772^{+0.018}_{-0.017}$ that is consistent with the fiducial case. The two low-redshift measurements are statistically consistent with the Planck Cosmic Microwave Background result, however, both recovered $S_8$ values are lower than the high-redshift prediction by $2.3sigma$ and $2.1sigma$ ($p$-values of 0.02 and 0.05), respectively. The measurements are shown to be internally consistent across redshift bins, angular scales and correlation functions. The analysis is demonstrated to be robust to calibration systematics, with the $S_8$ posterior consistent when varying the choice of redshift calibration sample, the modeling of redshift uncertainty and methodology. Similarly, we find that the corrections included to account for the blending of galaxies shifts our best-fit $S_8$ by $0.5sigma$ without incurring a substantial increase in uncertainty. We examine the limiting factors for the precision of the cosmological constraints and find observational systematics to be subdominant to the modeling of astrophysics. Specifically, we identify the uncertainties in modeling baryonic effects and intrinsic alignments as the limiting systematics.
Source arXiv, 2105.13543
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica