Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'506'133
Articles rated: 2609

26 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » astro-ph/9708237

 Article overview



Exploring Cluster Ellipticals as Cosmological Standard Rods
R. Bender ; R.P. Saglia ; B. Ziegler ; P. Belloni ; L. Greggio ; U. Hopp ; G. Bruzual ;
Date 26 Aug 1997
Subject astro-ph
AffiliationUniversitätssternwarte München) and G. Bruzual (CIDA
AbstractWe explore the possibility to calibrate massive cluster ellipticals as cosmological standard rods using the Fundamental Plane relation combined with a correction for luminosity evolution. Though cluster ellipticals certainly formed in a complex way, their passive evolution out to redshifts of about 1 indicates that basically all major merging and accretion events took place at higher redshifts. Therefore, a calibration of their luminosity evolution can be attempted. We propose to use the Mg$-sigma$ relation for that purpose because it is independent of distance and cosmology. We discuss a variety of possible caveats, ranging from dynamical evolution to uncertainties in stellar population models and evolution corrections to the presence of age spread. Sources of major random and systematic errors are analysed as well. We apply the described procedure to nine elliptical galaxies in two clusters at $z=0.375$ and derive constraints on the cosmological model. For the best fitting $Lambda$-free cosmological model we obtain: $q_o approx 0.1$, with 90% confidence limits being $0 < q_o < 0.7$ (the lower limit being due to the presence of matter in the Universe). If the inflationary scenario applies (i.e. the Universe has flat geometry), then, for the best fitting model, matter and $Lambda$ contribute about equally to the critical cosmic density (i.e. $Omega_m approx Omega_Lambda approx 0.5$). With 90% confidence $Omega_Lambda$ should be smaller than 0.9.
Source arXiv, astro-ph/9708237
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica