Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'506'133
Articles rated: 2609

26 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » astro-ph/9808242

 Article overview



Fast X-ray Transients and Gamma-ray Bursts: Constraints on Beaming
Jonathan E. Grindlay ;
Date 21 Aug 1998
Subject astro-ph
AffiliationHarvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
AbstractThe detection of x-ray afterglows of gamma-ray burst (GRB) sources has enabled the optical discovery that GRBs are at cosmological distances, which confirms that the enormous luminosities required must produce a relativistically expanding fireball. It is not yet clear if this expansion is quasi-spherical or beamed, or if the beaming differs between the prompt GRB and afterglow, although the differences for both source emission and population models are profound. We show that relative beaming (prompt vs. afterglow) may be constrained by analysis of the "fast transient" x-ray sources catalogued by Pye and McHardy (1983) from the Ariel V survey as well as several other (e.g. HEAO-A1/A2) surveys. After removing contamination from likely stellar transients, and scaling from x-ray/$gamma$-ray fluence ratios recently derived from Ginga and BeppoSAX, approximately half of the sources were possible prompt emission or afterglows from GRBs with gamma-ray fluence of >~1.2 X 10$^{-5} /erg-cm^2. Since the rate of these candidate afterglow events, 0.15 /day, is consistent with the BATSE logN-logS distribution, no difference in prompt vs. afterglow beaming is required. However more sensitive x-ray monitors or hard x-ray imaging surveys, with better temporal and spatial resolution, could provide strong constraints on GRBs and beaming.
Source arXiv, astro-ph/9808242
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica