|
| | | | |
| | | |
| Stat |
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'506'133
Articles rated: 2609
27 April 2024 |
|
| | | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
|
One-Line Redshifts and Searches for High-Redshift Lyman-Alpha Emission | | Daniel Stern
; Andrew J. Bunker
; Hyron Spinrad
; Arjun Dey
; | | Date: |
11 Feb 2000 | | Journal: | Astrophys.J. 537 (2000) 73-79 | | Subject: | astro-ph | | Affiliation: | 1 and 2), Andrew J. Bunker (1 and 3), Hyron Spinrad and Arjun Dey ( UC-Berkeley, JPL/Caltech, IoA, Cambridge, KPNO/NOAO | | Abstract: | We report the serendipitous discovery of two objects close in projection with fairly strong emission lines at long wavelength (~9190 A). One (A) seems not to be hosted by any galaxy brighter than V(555)=27.5, or I(814)=26.7 (Vega-based 3-sigma limits in 1.0 arcsec diameter apertures), while the other line is associated with a faint (I(814)~24.4) red galaxy (B) offset by 2.7 arcsec and 7 A spectrally. Both lines are broad (FWHM 700 km/s), extended spatially, and have high equivalent widths (W(A,obs)>1225 A, 95% confidence limit; W(B,obs)~150 A). No secondary spectral features are detected for galaxy A. Blue continuum and the marginal detection of a second weak line in the spectrum of galaxy B is consistent with [OII] (the strong line) and MgII (the weak line) at z=1.466. By association, galaxy A is likely at z=1.464, implying a rest-frame equivalent width of the [OII] emission line in excess of 600 A and a projected separation of 30 kpc for the galaxy pair. Conventional wisdom states that isolated emission lines with rest-frame equivalent widths larger than ~200 A are almost exclusively Lyman-alpha. This moderate-redshift discovery therefore compromises recent claims of high-redshift Lyman-alpha emitters for which other criteria (i.e., line profile, associated continuum decrements) are not reported. We discuss observational tests to distinguish Lyman-alpha emitters at high redshift from foreground systems. | | Source: | arXiv, astro-ph/0002239 | | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites | |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
| |
REGISTER