Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'506'133
Articles rated: 2609

27 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » cond-mat/0010141

 Article overview



Volume change of bulk metals and metal clusters due to spin-polarization
M. Payami ;
Date 10 Oct 2000
Journal J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 13, 4129 (2001).
Subject Materials Science; Atomic and Molecular Clusters | cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.atm-clus
AbstractThe stabilized jellium model (SJM) provides us a method to calculate the volume changes of different simple metals as a function of the spin polarization, $zeta$, of the delocalized valence electrons. Our calculations show that for bulk metals, the equilibrium Wigner-Seitz (WS) radius, $ar r_s(zeta)$, is always a n increasing function of the polarization i.e., the volume of a bulk metal always increases as $zeta$ increases, and the rate of increasing is higher for higher electron density metals. Using the SJM along with the local spin density approximation, we have also calculated the equilibrium WS radius, $ar r_s(N,zeta)$, of spherical jellium clusters, at which the pressure on the cluster with given numbers of total electrons, $N$, and their spin configuration $zeta$ vanishes. Our calculations f or Cs, Na, and Al clusters show that $ar r_s(N,zeta)$ as a function of $zeta$ behaves differently depending on whether $N$ corresponds to a closed-shell or an open-shell cluster. For a closed-shell cluster, it is an increasing function of $zeta$ over the whole range $0lezetale 1$, whereas in open-shell clusters it has a decreasing behavior over the range $0lezetalezeta_0$, where $zeta_0$ is a polarization that the cluster has a configuration consistent with Hund’s first rule. The resu lts show that for all neutral clusters with ground state spin configuration, $zeta_0$, the inequality $ar r_s(N,zeta_0)lear r_s(0)$ always holds (self-compression) but, at some polarization $zeta_1>zeta_0$, the inequality changes the direction (self-expansion). However, the inequality $ar r_s(N,zeta)lear r_s(zeta)$ always holds and the equality is achieved in the limit $N oinfty$.
Source arXiv, cond-mat/0010141
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica